lfk/backend
2
0
Fork 0
Code Issues 1 Pull Requests Actions Projects Releases 40 Activity

JWT Creation for users #12

New Issue
Closed
opened 2020-11-27 21:51:03 +00:00 by niggl · 0 comments
niggl commented 2020-11-27 21:51:03 +00:00
Owner
Copy Link

As soon as we implement users we should also switch the auth from a static key to user based.

As soon as we implement users we should also switch the auth from a static key to user based.
niggl added the
enhancement
 label 2020-11-27 21:51:03 +00:00
niggl added a new dependency 2020-11-27 21:51:09 +00:00
#6 Add authentification to our api
niggl added a new dependency 2020-11-27 21:51:15 +00:00
#11 Define classes
philipp referenced this issue from a commit 2020-12-04 21:17:05 +00:00
🚧 basic AuthErrors 🔒
philipp referenced this issue from a commit 2020-12-04 21:18:41 +00:00
basic Auth model
philipp referenced this issue from a commit 2020-12-04 21:19:57 +00:00
CreateAuth model
philipp referenced this issue from a commit 2020-12-04 21:28:19 +00:00
clean up jwtauth
philipp referenced this issue from a commit 2020-12-04 22:02:24 +00:00
UserNotFoundError
philipp referenced this issue from a commit 2020-12-04 22:03:11 +00:00
integrate UserNotFoundError
philipp referenced this issue from a commit 2020-12-04 22:03:25 +00:00
first jwt generation
philipp referenced this issue from a commit 2020-12-05 10:23:01 +00:00
🧹 clean up CreateAuth
philipp referenced this issue from a commit 2020-12-05 11:28:08 +00:00
🚧 JwtNotProvidedError
philipp referenced this issue from a commit 2020-12-05 12:07:01 +00:00
better errors
philipp referenced this issue from a commit 2020-12-05 12:07:35 +00:00
basic RefreshAuth checking
philipp removed a dependency 2020-12-09 18:57:01 +00:00
#6 Add authentification to our api
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Branch/Tag Specified
Branches Tags
Labels
Clear labels
bug
Something is not working
duplicate
This issue or pull request already exists
enhancement
New feature
help wanted
Need some help
invalid
Something is wrong
priority:high
priority:low
priority:medium
question
More information is needed
status:blocked
status:doing
status:review_needed
wontfix
This won't be fixed
Complexity
Easy
The complexity is low
Complexity
Hard
The complexity is high
Complexity
Medium
The complexity is medium
Kind/Bug
Something is not working
Kind/Enhancement
Improve existing functionality
Kind/Feature
New functionality
Kind/Question
A question
Kind/Security
This is security issue
Kind/Testing
Issue or pull request related to testing
Priority
Critical
The priority is critical
Priority
High
The priority is high
Priority
Low
The priority is low
Priority
Medium
The priority is medium
Reviewed
Confirmed
Issue has been confirmed
Reviewed
Duplicate
This issue or pull request already exists
Reviewed
Invalid
Invalid issue
Reviewed
Won't Fix
This issue won't be fixed
Status
Abandoned
Somebody has started to work on this but abandoned work
Status
Blocked
Something is blocking this issue or pull request
Status/Confirmed
This is indeed a bug/issue
Status
Doing
Somebody is working on this
Status
Need More Info
Feedback is required to reproduce issue or to continue work
Status
Review needed
Needs a reveiw
No Label
enhancement
Milestone
No items
No Milestone
Projects
Clear projects
No project
Assignees
Clear assignees
niggl odit_bot philipp
No Assignees
1 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Depends on
#11 Define classes
lfk/backend
Reference: lfk/backend#12
No description provided.
Delete Branch "%!s()"

Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?